So, here we are again. At the beginning of a bust period in the typical boom/bust economic cycle. Lots of ordinary people are fretting if they can continue to pay the mortgage. Workers are concerned about their jobs if a recession does indeed come. Economists are worried about the ever weakening dollar and the many effects it will have around the world. Everybody is concerned about oil and other commodities maintaining their skyward cost projections, which in part stems from the weak dollar. The struggling dollar was made weaker by the recent Fed rate cut, which Mr. Bernanke decided to do in an attempt to resuscitate financial markets after they took a pounding from the sub-prime crisis. Lots to worry about. In such times politicians pounce on the opportunity to spew populist rhetoric to win votes. With the elections next year, this economic bust probably came at the worst possible time.
While there are many culprits for the recent financial and economic downturn, perhaps the biggest suspects are Wall Street and those who implement public policy. Ray Carey, former CEO of ADT, Inc., and author, wrote about Wall Street speculators and finance law in his book, "Democratic Capitalism." In parts of his book he examines the Wall Street machine that lends hefty amounts of money to hedge funds and other "leveraged speculators," which in conjunction with flawed public policies (volatile currencies and derivatives to name a few), are the agents of boom and bust economic cycles. He wrote:
"Adam Smith specified that the success of free markets depends on money that is ample, low-cost, non-volatile, and patient. Smith also warned that speculators would deflect capital away from growth, and make money scarce, high-cost, volatile, and impatient. Smith defined the mission of finance capitalism as helping companies grow, offering advice, and lending money that meets Smith's criterion of neutrality while avoiding damage from speculators."
Mr. Carey continues about flaws in Wall Street's short term outlooks and public policy:
"The ultra-capitalistic distribution of surplus for short-term personal gain is stock buy-backs and non-strategic acquisitions. Why, then, do tax laws favor stock buy-backs and non-strategic acquisitions? Too many hints have already been provided: The answer is that public policy is determined not for the general welfare but based on the lobby power of Wall Street."
"The United States government ... escalated the traditional impediment of wealth concentration into a dominant influence that damages both economic and social opportunities. An extraordinary volatility in international currency and interest rates resulted from the American government's floating the dollar in 1971 without an alternative stabilizing mechanism or control of speculation with borrowed money. This was followed in 1974 by a further U.S. government action that coupled the excessive volatility with excessive liquidity. A new law, ERISA, required present funding of future pension benefits and effectively took about $100 billion a year out of the economy and delivered most of it to the stock market with only a part of that sum recycled into the economy. In addition to the volatile and impatient money that these mistakes caused, the government in the last quarter of the 20th century compounded the problem by deregulating finance capitalism at the same time it was abrogating the market disciplines upon which free markets depend."
I don't mean to attack hedge funds, private equity, or other financiers, that is not my intention. However, government and business leaders need to take a hard look at current laws, taxes, and regulation that impact people's daily lives. To point the finger at someone else or turn a blind eye to the problem means one is unfit for duty.